Difference between revisions of "Repository work flow structure"

From OpenEMR Project Wiki
(Created page with '==Overview== Our official repository is kept on sourceforge via git. We recently migrated from cvs, which is described HERE. Our sourceforge repository also has three official mi…')
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:57, 11 November 2010

Overview

Our official repository is kept on sourceforge via git. We recently migrated from cvs, which is described HERE. Our sourceforge repository also has three official mirrors, which are described HERE. To avoid breaking the main sourceforge git repository, we are using the following work flow and development structure.

Structure and work flow

  • Integration Developers
    • These are the only developers with commit access to the sourceforge repository.
    • They have demonstrated common sense and proficiency in git and OpenEMR development.
    • They are responsible for committing their own code.
    • They are willing to commit the code of the "Privileged" developers (when requested).
    • A standardized method to commit to the sourceforge repository has been documented HERE . Rather than pull in the entire remote branch of somebody else's code, recommend pulling in each commit via the 'cherry-pick' command.
  • Privileged Developers
    • These are developers that have demonstrated common sense and proficiency in OpenEMR development.
    • They do not have commit access to the sourceforge repository.
    • Their code will be directly committed to the sourceforge repository upon request by an "Integrator" (no questions asked and within 24 hours).
      • Best way to do this is to submit code via a public git branch. (instructions on how to do this can be found here). If this is done correctly, then it only takes an "Integrator" several minutes to commit your code to the sourceforge repository.
  • Near-Privileged Developers
    • These are developers that have demonstrated common sense and proficiency in OpenEMR development, however we still need to see a little more work before they are considered a "Privileged" developer.
    • They do not have commit access to the sourceforge repository.
    • Their code needs to be reviewed before committing to the sourceforge repository.
      • Best way to do this is to submit code via a public git branch. (instructions on how to do this can be found here). If this is done correctly, then it only takes an "Integrator" several minutes to commit your code to the sourceforge repository if deemed acceptable.
  • Standard Developers
    • Standard developers whom have or are in process of submitting code.
    • They do not have commit access to the sourceforge repository.
    • Their code needs to be reviewed before committing to the sourceforge repository.
      • Best way to do this is to submit code via a public git branch. (instructions on how to do this can be found here). If this is done correctly, then it only takes an "Integrator" several minutes to commit your code to the sourceforge repository if deemed acceptable.

Developers

Integration Developers

bradymiller
stephen-smith
sunsetsystems (Rod at Sunset Systems)
tmccormi (Tony at Medical Information Integration)

Privileged Developers

acmoore
andres_paglayan
cfapress
drbowen (Sam at Medical Information Integration)
larrylart
markleeds
mmfsystems (Vineet at MMF Systems)
rachoac (Aron at Medical Information Integration)
tekknogenius
visolve-selvi (Selvi at Visolve)
whimmel
zhhealthcare (Paul, Jacob, Sam, and Eldho at Z&H Healthcare Solutions)

Near-Privileged Developers

coleedo (Connie at Phyaura)

Standard Developers

arnabnaha
clucena ( Chris at EHRLive)
hrivera
ytiddo